GRE/GMAT寫作高頻話題：媒體責任與個人隱私
GRE和GMAT寫作中有一類話題涉及到Mass Media的報道權以及隱私的保護問題，那么媒體的責任道德涉及什么含義以及到底如何約束日益過度的媒體報道呢?掌握這樣的概念對于大家寫作這類社會話題有很大的益處和啟發。
道德約束應該成為資訊從業人員的指導方針，并保護個人權利。第一件事是建立客觀普適的道德規范。道德標準不是強制性的，因此一些人并不遵從。
Ethical restraint would set guidelines for journalists and protect individual rights. The first issue would be to set objective and universal guidelines, so that there would be no debate over who sets the ethical code. The problem would be enforcing these guidelines. The Radio Television News Directors Association and the Society of Professional Journalists both have ethical codes, which include respecting those whom you are reporting about and keeping confidentiality. Those ethical standards are not enforced and so some do not follow them. Some people believe in free speech at all costs. Free speech without restraint causes public outcry and violates peoples civil rights like their right to privacy. The difficulty is that people see any form of restraint as censorship and then claim that the government will begin running our lives and making our decisions. If the ethical standards agreed upon were universal they would satisfy everyone and if the journalists would follow them there would be no need for government intervention.
GRE和GMAT寫作中有一類話題涉及到Mass Media的報道權以及隱私的保護問題，那么媒體的責任道德涉及什么含義以及到底如何約束日益過度的媒體報道呢?掌握這樣的概念對于大家寫作這類社會話題有很大的益處和啟發。
道德約束應該成為資訊從業人員的指導方針，并保護個人權利。第一件事是建立客觀普適的道德規范。道德標準不是強制性的，因此一些人并不遵從。
Ethical restraint would set guidelines for journalists and protect individual rights. The first issue would be to set objective and universal guidelines, so that there would be no debate over who sets the ethical code. The problem would be enforcing these guidelines. The Radio Television News Directors Association and the Society of Professional Journalists both have ethical codes, which include respecting those whom you are reporting about and keeping confidentiality. Those ethical standards are not enforced and so some do not follow them. Some people believe in free speech at all costs. Free speech without restraint causes public outcry and violates peoples civil rights like their right to privacy. The difficulty is that people see any form of restraint as censorship and then claim that the government will begin running our lives and making our decisions. If the ethical standards agreed upon were universal they would satisfy everyone and if the journalists would follow them there would be no need for government intervention.
